Enter a search term:
My Twitter @sinocanadian
- Environmental activists should not smoke. 2012/02/21
- A smoker emits more CO2 and toxic emissions than a non-smoker. The environmental impact of tobacco production is heavy. 2012/02/21
-
Recent Posts
- EV Growth: Challenges and Opportunities
- Motorbikes Scooting Back in Beijing – what are the motorcycle rules?
- Transformers taking China
- Electric Car in the Beijing Wild — Caught on Camera!
- Civilized Chaoyang Traffic Control – Manual style
- Beijing Energy and Environment Roundtable Slides
- Was Down – now back up
- Where does Beijing’s real time traffic info come from?
Category Archives: High Carbon Energy Sources
Lifecycle GHG emissions of various sources of crude – Alberta
A new study commissioned by the Alberta (Canada) government demonstrates that lifecycle GHG emissions of different sources of crude oil are different, and that China (and all countries) need to take note of this in their transport sector emission calculations.
The … Continue reading
It’s no wonder the Chinese aren’t interested…
Cooperation in the oil sands is grinding to a halt, and it is going to have a big effect on the ability of government to get work done in the region. In the past few days, the Cumulative Environmental … Continue reading
Posted in High Carbon Energy Sources, Oil Sands
Tagged CEMA, slow down oil sands, tar sands
Leave a comment
Imperial Oil Defends Oil Sands Development
Well, it’s offical. Oil sands are going to save the planet, bringing much
needed prosperity to all.
The Calgary Herald reported today that Imperial Oil (whose parent company, Exxon, is one of the biggest corporate “climate change disblievers” out there) has demonstrated how good and selfless they are in developing the oil sands – for the sake of all … Continue reading